Emanuel Lasker Amazing Piece Sacrifice
Strategy

Emanuel Lasker Amazing Piece Sacrifice

Emanuel Lasker Amazing Piece Sacrifice

Today we are going to see one of the greatest chess games ever played in the chess history – it’s the game between Emanuel Lasker and William Steinitz in the World Chess Championship 1894. It really is a very interesting game that teaches us how king safety is way more important than any material advantage. It’s also amazing to see how Lasker used his resources really well.

World Chess Championship 1894 – Lasker vs Steinitz

Lasker vs SteinitzThe fifth World Chess Championship was held in New York City (games 1-8), Philadelphia (games 9-11) and Montreal (games 12-19) between March 15 and May 26, 1894. Defending Champion William Steinitz lost his title to challenger Emanuel Lasker, who was 32 years his junior.

Did you know? The reigning World Champion Steinitz publicly spoke of retiring; Emanuel Lasker challenged him, and he changed his mind. Initially, Lasker wanted to play for $5,000 a side and a match was agreed at stakes of $3,000 a side, but Steinitz agreed to a series of reductions when Lasker found it difficult to raise the money, and the final figure was $2,000 each, which was less than for some of Steinitz’s earlier matches.

The first player to win ten games would be the champion. Steinitz had previously declared he would win without doubt, so it came as a shock when Lasker won the first game. Eventually, Lasker won the Championship, thanks to his consecutive wins from Game-7 to Game-11. Some commentators thought Steinitz’s habit of playing “experimental” moves in serious competition was a major factor in his downfall.
World Chess Championship 1894 – Lasker vs SteinitzIn this lesson, we are going to see the first win from those five consecutive wins (Games 7 to 11), i.e. Game-7, where Lasker was truly brilliant. You can see the position below from the middlegame (or perhaps, middlegame-to-endgame stage).
Lasker vs Steinitz

Black to play

The above position arrived after Lasker’s move 34.Rhg1. Steinitz is clearly ahead in material – he is two pawns up, his queen and rooks are on the open file, and he also has a queenside majority. BUT, were these helpful for him?

No! White clearly has the (positional) advantage here – Black’s king is in serious danger. His knight is on h8, the corner of the board. You might have heard the saying “Knights on the rim are dim”. That’s exactly why Steinitz lost this game. Though he had the material advantage, his lack of king safety was enough for Lasker to exploit him.

[alert type="danger" close="false" heading="Recommended"] Learn how critical converting your advantage into a win is! [/alert]

Watch the instructive video analysis of this game presented by one of the team members of RCA, Manuel Ocantos.

About the author – Manuel Ocantos

Manuel Ocantos
I am ELO rated 2217, one of the top players of Luxembourg, have beaten several IMs in classical chess and drew against GM’s and the best Argentine players. I am the Vice-President of Marketing of the Remote Chess Academy 🙂 In my free time I’m a lifelong learner and traveler.

7 Best Chess Opening Traps

I hope you enjoy reading this blog post.

If you want GM Igor Smirnov to help you get better at chess, watch this Masterclass.

Free Training

Swipe Up to Get Better at Chess!
How Do GMs Find the Best Moves? Improve FASTER at Chess
Watch Now
Close